Deadline: Monday 10 March 2025
27-29 August 2025, University of Warwick
Theme: On Joy and Ecstasy
What is the role of joy in theatre and performance? How does the idea of “a good night out” (Aston & Harris, 2012) shape our theatrical landscape? And, how do joy and ecstasy figure beyond the idea of theatre as entertainment? What are the dramaturgical limitations and possibilities of staging joy and/or ecstasy? What is the politics associated with such stagings?
Joy
In the past decade, contemporary liberation movements have sought to harness the political potential of joy. Kleaver Cruz, founder of the Black Joy Project, says that Black Joy “does not dismiss the realities of our collective pain … It’s about using that joy as an entry into understanding the oppressive forces we navigate through as a means to imagine and create a world free of them” (Nichols n.d.). For example, Tawala Theatre’s 2024 Black Joy Season sought to “ensure that Black talent and creativity are at the heart of building cohesion in our country” (Talawa.com).
Joy, in such terms, cannot exist without the oppositional oppression it rebels against, it is not simply an emotion but rather an “increase in one’s power to affect and be affected. It is the capacity to do and feel more” (Montgomery 2017, p 29-30). The radical nature of this joy has been identified and mobilised for its political and transformative potential. Petra Kupper’s 2022 work on experiments in disabled performance “in pain and joy” foster connection and the co-creation of disability cultures through somatic dance practice. In December of 2024, Sexualities produced a special issue ‘Mobilising queer joy: Establishing queer joy studies’ as a call to protest oppression in the form of rising colonial, settler, anti-queer, ableist, anti-trans, carceral and ecologically damaging rhetoric and legislation. This academic provocation reflects trends already in existence within theatre and performance. Performative events and interventions such as Drag Storytime, inclusive and accessible festivals such as Hijinx’s Unity Festival (Wales) and No Limits Festival (Netherlands) and theatre collective Y no había luz’s performances of care amidst disaster response (Puerto Rico), all evoke joy as means for collective resistance and/or social transformation.
At the same time, positivity and optimism have been regarded with suspicion from an Affect Studies perspective because they paper over the cracks of a neoliberal system structured around the impossible promise of happiness and fulfilment built on the back of personal responsibility (Ahmed 2010). Lauren Berlant’s Cruel Optimism, featured in last year’s Working Group discussions on precarity/precariousness, details a concept that has become crucial to considerations of how hope and happiness are coopted into the neoliberal structures shaping ordinary life. Objects become cruelly optimistic “when the object that draws your attachment actively impedes the aim that brought you to it initially” (Berlant, 2011 p.1); an observation which speaks clearly to the contrasting aims brought to cultural production within and beyond the theatre industry.
In a more positive light, the liveness of theatre, the theatrical event can be a conduit for joy as celebration of togetherness, enabled not only by the staged performance but also by the context and spaces where the theatrical event takes place. In her 2024 talk at Queen’s University (Belfast), Performance as Possibility: Finding Joy and Hope at the Theatre, Jill Dolan asked important questions about theatre as celebration and togetherness: “What can theatre model about the joy and hopefulness of being together with strangers, witnessing the narrative, aesthetic, and emotional possibilities of performance? How can theatre help us practice social encounters based on joy and hope?” (QUB.ac.uk).
Taking inspiration from this, joy perhaps becomes synonymous with a sense of community, space for support and exchange, and of different cultures and peoples coming together. Audre Lorde suggests that “the sharing of joy, whether physical, emotional, psychic, or intellectual, forms a bridge between the sharers which can be the basis for understanding much of what is not shared between them, and lessens the threat of their difference” (1978, p. 7). In this sense, theatre in the community, amateur theatre, forum theatre and beyond, can exemplify joy as celebration of togetherness.
Ecstasy
To be ecstatic means, literally to be “outside of oneself” (Butler, 2004 p. 20), coming from the Greek ex (outside) and stasis (to stand). The ecstatic finds political articulation in concepts such as mystical anarchism (Critchley, 2009), as well as the rousing sense of collectivity experienced in protest movements and political rallies. It can refer to out-of-body experiences of jouissance, an apolitical sense of being beside oneself with joy and immersion in collective experiences, such as those which performance spectatorships offer. Such experiences are seen across theatre and performance history, from Euripides’ The Baccahe to the mysticism of Antonin Artaud’s Theatre of Cruelty, from Drag Shows to musical theatre fandom. Theatre, as a form of quasi-religious ritual, has the potential to find/explore/access the ecstatic, to push boundaries, raise questions about our world, our societal structures and our relationships. And yet, theatre’s fundamental representational functionality raises questions of stageability; what is stageable and what is not? Is it possible for theatre to represent the out-of-body, the beyond-real, the beyond-life associated with ecstasy?
So, how, if at all, is it possible to stage ecstasy or evoke ecstatic response, in such a way to activate its radical political potential? What directorial and dramaturgical strategies make and hold space for ecstasy and/or transformative joy?
We invite participants to engage with these ideas and questions, reflecting on different historical, contemporary and future dramaturgies. Proposals might cover but need not be limited to the following topics:
Please note: only one proposal may be submitted for a TaPRA event. It is not permitted to submit multiple proposals or submit the same proposal to several Calls for Participation. All presenters must be TaPRA members, i.e. registered for the event; this includes presentations given by Skype or other media broadcast even where the presenter may not physically attend the event venue.